This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Dancause, N. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Dancause, N. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Vicarious Function of Remote Cortex following Stroke: Recent Evidence from Human and Animal Studies

Department of Neurology, University of Rochester, numa_dancause{at}urmc.rochester.edu

Following a lesion, the adult central nervous system undergoes dramatic structural and physiological reorganization in diverse subcortical and cortical areas. Our knowledge of the events that parallel recovery within the tissue surrounding the lesion and other distant cortical areas has evolved greatly in the past few years. Particularly, recent efforts have increased our understanding of the potential implication of premotor areas in recovery from lesions disturbing the primary motor cortex (M1) and its corticospinal outputs. Because these areas share extensive connections with M1 and have direct access to the spinal cord through corticospinal projections, they are particularly well positioned to take over the role of M1 in a vicarious manner and thus compensate for the neuronal loss resulting from M1 lesions. The impressive postlesional reorganization known to occur in many areas of the CNS including the premotor cortex traditionally has been assumed to play a beneficial role in recovery. However, recent experiments suggest that in some cases, reorganization of distant cortical areas correlates with poor recovery, raising the concept of maladaptive vicarious process. This concept might be particularly critical in the development of new treatment approaches favoring postlesion plasticity and even more so for interventions targeting specific area(s). Here, the author reviews human and animal studies that show the plastic potential of the adult CNS after stroke, highlighting the vicarious role of the premotor cortex in the recovery of motor control.

Key Words: Motor control • Plasticity • Premotor cortex • Recovery • Stroke

The Neuroscientist, Vol. 12, No. 6, 489-499 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1073858406292782


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Ganguly, L. Secundo, G. Ranade, A. Orsborn, E. F. Chang, D. F. Dimitrov, J. D. Wallis, N. M. Barbaro, R. T. Knight, and J. M. Carmena Cortical Representation of Ipsilateral Arm Movements in Monkey and Man J. Neurosci., October 14, 2009; 29(41): 12948 - 12956. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. H. Dobkin Confounders in Rehabilitation Trials of Task-Oriented Training: Lessons From the Designs of the EXCITE and SCILT Multicenter Trials Neurorehabil Neural Repair, January 1, 2007; 21(1): 3 - 13. [Abstract] [PDF]