This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Hegdé, J. Articles by Felleman, D. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hegdé, J. Articles by Felleman, D. J. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Reappraising the Functional Implications of the Primate Visual Anatomical Hierarchy

Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, hegde{at}umn.edu

Daniel J. Felleman

Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy, University of Texas Medical School, Houston, Texas

The primate visual system has been shown to be organized into an anatomical hierarchy by the application of a few principled criteria. It has been widely assumed that cortical visual processing is also hierarchical, with the anatomical hierarchy providing a defined substrate for clear levels of hierarchical function. A large body of empirical evidence seemed to support this assumption, including the general observations that functional properties of visual neurons grow progressively more complex at progressively higher levels of the anatomical hierarchy. However, a growing body of evidence, including recent direct experimental comparisons of functional properties at two or more levels of the anatomical hierarchy, indicates that visual processing neither is hierarchical nor parallels the anatomical hierarchy. Recent results also indicate that some of the pathways of visual information flow are not hierarchical, so that the anatomical hierarchy cannot be taken as a strict flowchart of visual information either. Thus, while the sustaining strength of the notion of hierarchical processing may be that it is rather simple, its fatal flaw is that it is overly simplistic. NEUROSCIENTIST 13(5):416—421, 2007. DOI: 10.1177/1073858407305201

Key Words: Feedback • Feed-forward • Thalamocortical relay • Pure vision • Recurrent processing

The Neuroscientist, Vol. 13, No. 5, 416-421 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1073858407305201


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Ahissar, M. Nahum, I. Nelken, and S. Hochstein Reverse hierarchies and sensory learning Phil Trans R Soc B, February 12, 2009; 364(1515): 285 - 299. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]