This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Sabel, B. A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Sabel, B. A. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Unrecognized Potential of Surviving Neurons: : Within-systems Plasticity, Recovery of Function, and the Hypothesis of Minimal Residual Structure

When brain structures are incompletely injured, even a very small number of surviving neurons is sufficient for recovery of the lost functions to occur. Several examples are presented: 1) After partial lesions of the adult rat optic nerve an initial, complete blindness is followed, within a few weeks, by significant recovery of visual functions to near-normal levels. This is possible despite the presence of only about 10% of surviving retinal gan glion cells. 2) In Parkinson's disease, clinical signs manifest only when more than 70%-80% of the dopamine (DA)-containing cells are lost. When the lesion is greater than about 95%, locomotor performance can no longer be compensated, but with the implantation of as little as 5%-10% of the original DA-cell number, significant motor improvements may be achieved. 3) Similarly, in spinal cord-injured rats, recovery of locomotor performance is still observed in animals with lesions greater than 95% where only a small rim of tissue survives the injury. It is therefore proposed that a certain "minimal residual structure" (MRS), often 10% or less, is required for functions to recover following CNS injury. In the context of this "within-systems" plasticity, the MRS-hypoth esis emphasizes the role of spared neuronal tissue in brain plasticity and points to an unrecognized potential of residual neurons to contribute to recovery of function. Future therapeutic studies should make use of behavioral assays "at threshold," in which the MRS is defined so as to avoid the inappropriate rejection of potentially useful therapeutic strategies. NEUROSCIENTIST 3:366-370, 1997

Key Words: Plasticity • Visual system • Recovery

The Neuroscientist, Vol. 3, No. 6, 366-370 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/107385849700300609


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. A. Poggel, E. Kasten, and B. A. Sabel Attentional cueing improves vision restoration therapy in patients with visual field defects Neurology, December 14, 2004; 63(11): 2069 - 2076. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]