SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The Neuroscientist
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hallett, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hallett, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Reviews

{blacksquare} REVIEW : Plasticity in the Human Motor System

Mark Hallett

Human Motor Control Section Medical Neurology Branch National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke National Institutes of Health Bethesda, Maryland

The organization of motor representation in the human brain is plastic in a number of situations. Plasticity may be caused by unmasking of pre-existing connections, activity dependent synaptic changes, changes in membrane excitability, or growth of new connections. In peripheral injury, such as amputation, regions of brain no longer have a peripheral target. Neighboring motor representation areas targeting muscles ipsilat eral and proximal to the amputation stump enlarge into this territory. Some changes can occur quickly, whereas others require years; this probably reflects different processes. In early brain injury, including pa tients with hemispherectomy, some recovery of function seems related to enhancement of ipsilateral path ways. Stroke in adult life may cause some reorganization in the lesioned hemisphere, and the role of ipsilateral pathways is not yet well established. Patterns of use and motor learning can influence brain organization. Use of a body part increases its representation, whereas disuse reduces representation. In motor learning, such as learning a finger sequence, the representation of muscles involved with the learning increases in size. Plasticity can even be cross-modal, as demonstrated by the functional role of the visual cortex when the blind read Braille. NEUROSCIENTIST 5:324-332, 1999

Key Words: KEY WORDS Brain plasticity • Brain injuries • Motor representation • Motor learning

The Neuroscientist, Vol. 5, No. 5, 324-332 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/107385849900500518


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
S H Peurala, K Pitkanen, J Sivenius, and I M Tarkka
Cutaneous electrical stimulation may enhance sensorimotor recovery in chronic stroke
Clinical Rehabilitation, July 1, 2002; 16(7): 709 - 716.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
B. B. Johansson
Brain Plasticity and Stroke Rehabilitation : The Willis Lecture
Stroke, January 1, 2000; 31(1): 223 - 230.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Advertisement