The Neuroscientist

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Redmond, D. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Redmond, D. E., Jr
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
The Neuroscientist, Vol. 8, No. 5, 457-488 (2002)

Cellular Replacement Therapy for Parkinson's Disease—Where We Are Today?

D. Eugene Redmond, Jr

Neural Transplantation and Repair Program, Departments of Psychiatry and Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine

The concept of replacing lost dopamine neurons in Parkinson's disease using mesencephalic brain cellsfrom fetal cadavers has been supported by over 20 years of research in animals and over a decade of clinicalstudies. The ambitious goal of these studies was no less than a molecular and cellular "cure" forParkinson's disease, other neurodegenerative diseases, and spinal cord injury. Much research has beendone in rodents, and a few studies have been done in nonhuman primate models. Early uncontrolled clinicalreports were enthusiastic, but the outcome of the first randomized, double blind, controlled study challengedthe idea that dopamine replacement cells can cure Parkinson's disease, although there were somesignificant positive findings. Were the earlier animal studies and clinical reports wrong? Should we give upon the goal? Some aspects of the trial design and implantation methods may have led to lack of effectsand to some side effects such as dyskinesias. But a detailed review of clinical neural transplants publishedto date still suggests that neural transplantation variably reverses some aspects of Parkinson's disease,although differing methods make exact comparisons difficult. While the randomized clinical studies havebeen in progress, new methods have shown promise for increasing transplant survival and distribution,reconstructing the circuits to provide dopamine to the appropriate targets and with normal regulation.Selected promising new strategies are reviewed that block apoptosis induced by tissue dissection, promotevascularization of grafts, reduce oxidant stress, provide key growth factors, and counteract adverse effectsof increased age. New sources of replacement cells and stem cells may provide additional advantages forthe future. Full recovery from parkinsonism appears not only to be possible, but a reliable cell replacementtreatment may finally be near.

Key Words: fetal neural transplantation • Parkinson's • human primate stem cell


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
D. E. Redmond Jr., K. B. Bjugstad, Y. D. Teng, V. Ourednik, J. Ourednik, D. R. Wakeman, X. H. Parsons, R. Gonzalez, B. C. Blanchard, S. U. Kim, et al.
From the Cover: Behavioral improvement in a primate Parkinson's model is associated with multiple homeostatic effects of human neural stem cells
PNAS, July 17, 2007; 104(29): 12175 - 12180.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
History of the Human SciencesHome page
T. Moreira and P. Palladino
Between truth and hope: on Parkinson's disease, neurotransplantation and the production of the 'self'
History of the Human Sciences, August 1, 2005; 18(3): 55 - 82.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
C. V. Borlongan, M. Hadman, C. Davis Sanberg, and P. R. Sanberg
Central Nervous System Entry of Peripherally Injected Umbilical Cord Blood Cells Is Not Required for Neuroprotection in Stroke
Stroke, October 1, 2004; 35(10): 2385 - 2389.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]